|
Post by Henry Gale on Jun 11, 2007 1:34:03 GMT -4
He has a mole? I never noticed, LoL. Should we start a fanclub for that, too?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2007 1:36:39 GMT -4
Isn't it funny how they try to make them look so perfect and they come off plasticlike. They should leave them be human beings. On the side of perfection, Matthew should get braces. LOL. LOL, you know I never really gave that much thought. But I have noticed that the close-cropped hair look that he's got has some "breaches" on the sides on occasion. I think it's sort of update of the ol' combover. Ha!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2007 1:47:35 GMT -4
He has a mole? I never noticed, LoL. Should we start a fanclub for that, too? I shudder to think of the consequences should he actually remove it. There would be this schism in fandom with the mole-group squaring off against the post-mole group. It's very minor. More just a bump.
|
|
|
Post by Henry Gale on Jun 11, 2007 3:05:56 GMT -4
He has a mole? I never noticed, LoL. Should we start a fanclub for that, too? I shudder to think of the consequences should he actually remove it. There would be this schism in fandom with the mole-group squaring off against the post-mole group. It's very minor. More just a bump. Ah, yes. I see it now. ;D
|
|
|
Post by benlinusisagoodguy on Jun 11, 2007 3:54:09 GMT -4
Sorry to interrupt the mood here, but I agree this photo was toned and reworked, first of all to give it a darker, "Lost" feel, and then to reduce or remove some features to make the stars visually palatable to fragile American viewers. I think they were all standing together, but they were groomed and dressed for this photo (as you can read in the tiny print in EW), and Elizabeth's face is smoothed out to remove the wrinkles she naturally has (which btw I don't find her wrinkles offensive, but I understand editors and designers think people will drop to the floor in shock if they see wrinkles on someone under 40), and Michael's mole or whatever it is he has on his left cheek is gone. Oddly, I don't like the fact that it's gone via photo editing even though every time I see it otherwise, I'm distracted by it and always thinking, "why doesn't he have that removed. It's so easily done." And Matthew, well, what is to be done about Matthew. He always seems to be scowling. Probably he isn't, but he comes off that way. yeah thats what i was trying to say lol sophies dumb
|
|
|
Post by benlinusisagoodguy on Jun 11, 2007 3:55:34 GMT -4
He has a mole? I never noticed, LoL. Should we start a fanclub for that, too? I shudder to think of the consequences should he actually remove it. There would be this schism in fandom with the mole-group squaring off against the post-mole group. It's very minor. More just a bump. awww i think its cute. makes him even more quirky
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Jun 11, 2007 4:47:22 GMT -4
I shudder to think of the consequences should he actually remove it. There would be this schism in fandom with the mole-group squaring off against the post-mole group. It's very minor. More just a bump. awww i think its cute. makes him even more quirky i agree ;D
|
|
|
Post by bobdoc on Jun 11, 2007 9:53:47 GMT -4
Well, De Niro's pretty much done for as a legitimate actor nowadays, so maybe Michael can take the "best actor with a mole on his face" position now.
|
|