|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Oct 29, 2008 16:35:41 GMT -4
m-emerson-news.livejournal.com/48850.htmlHere's a teaser: I have huge hi-rise, but I can't upload them to the photogallery, yet. I have not been given permission. However, in my blog, that is a different story.
|
|
|
Post by benlinusisagoodguy on Oct 29, 2008 16:38:00 GMT -4
OMG squee!!!!! the one with the sword is so funny! and check out the bum shot too i love his outfit.
|
|
|
Post by benobsessed on Oct 29, 2008 16:44:24 GMT -4
Cool, you found a bigger picture than the one I stole from Henryian daily *resists saying soemthign about the sword* The bottom piccy is very cute (as in the fourth picture......not the.... well yes but...... well you know )
|
|
|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Oct 29, 2008 16:45:46 GMT -4
Cool, you found a bigger picture than the one I stole from Henryian daily *resists saying soemthign about the sword* The bottom piccy is very cute (as in the fourth picture......not the.... well yes but...... well you know ) That kind of talk can be done in my or your journal *winks* ooh sorry, wasnt meaning to modify your comment, was trying to quote it *smacks back of hand for being a naughty admin*
|
|
|
Post by benobsessed on Oct 29, 2008 16:53:12 GMT -4
Cool, you found a bigger picture than the one I stole from Henryian daily *resists saying soemthign about the sword* The bottom piccy is very cute (as in the fourth picture......not the.... well yes but...... well you know ) That kind of talk can be done in my or your journal *winks* ooh sorry, wasnt meaning to modify your comment, was trying to quote it *smacks back of hand for being a naughty admin* Yours, you have more pictures
|
|
|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Oct 29, 2008 17:33:33 GMT -4
Cool, you found a bigger picture than the one I stole from Henryian daily *resists saying soemthign about the sword* The bottom piccy is very cute (as in the fourth picture......not the.... well yes but...... well you know ) That kind of talk can be done in my or your journal *winks* ooh sorry, wasnt meaning to modify your comment, was trying to quote it *smacks back of hand for being a naughty admin* I have done the same mistake many times. I wish that the buttons were a bit separated.
|
|
|
Post by bobdoc on Oct 29, 2008 18:03:51 GMT -4
All of the Michael goodness, none of the hundreds of dollars you would have needed to see it in person.
|
|
|
Post by rage on Oct 29, 2008 18:20:13 GMT -4
omg i'm dead! this stuff is awesome!
|
|
|
Post by foldslinus on Oct 29, 2008 18:58:34 GMT -4
LOL at the sword
Is that Carrie between Michael and Elizabeth?
|
|
|
Post by tigerlily on Oct 29, 2008 20:29:15 GMT -4
Sigh....Michael and Ian on the same stage, doing Shakespeare no less...that's my version of paradise. Thank you sooooo much for the piccys - they just made my day!!! (a little more Ian would've been nice!)
|
|
|
Post by greenleaf on Oct 30, 2008 13:44:54 GMT -4
Excellent pics! I love Michael's expressions
|
|
|
Post by queeniefox on Oct 30, 2008 20:10:10 GMT -4
Hee, great pics there!
|
|
|
Post by snivellusfriend on Oct 31, 2008 19:29:43 GMT -4
Thanks for the pics, Edith! Oh, no! Michael's character stabbed himself! I read that scene last night and, despite it being a comedic scene, I felt sad, reading the words...so sad and poetic. They seemed to have had a good time! I'm surprised that they had scripts in their hands, though; Ian's wife said they were experienced actors, so I was expecting that they'd know the lines pretty much by heart, already, and would only need to practice a bit, to remember them, (especially Michael, since he said that his favorite book to read was 'The Complete Works of Shakespeare') but I suppose they didn't have enough time to do that. It destroys the illusion of seeing a character live their life in the play, for me, though. I'm very surprised that it seems to be accepted in the theatre. I wouldn't have held a script; I've always believed that an audience deserves the best performance, no matter what, even if it's for charity. Holding the script in front of an audience seems more like watching a rehearsal to me, an unfinished work in progress, similiar to seeing an actor recording their dialogue in a studio; I found the tall stands distracting, too. Or perhaps, their characters were holding scripts for their play? If theatres don't already do this, I thought that another way that they could raise money, rather than overwhelming people by asking for so much at one time, (judging by the seats that they still had left near the performance day, I'd say the price kept people away) is to have a donation box in the lobby, year-round, for all shows, in case, someone might want to give extra, spare change after a show. Is that Carrie between Michael and Elizabeth? Yes; That looks like Carrie to me.
|
|
|
Post by phistolemon on Nov 1, 2008 12:06:41 GMT -4
I'm surprised that they had scripts in their hands, though; Ian's wife said they were experienced actors, so I was expecting that they'd know the lines pretty much by heart, already, and would only need to practice a bit, to remember them, (especially Michael, since he said that his favorite book to read was 'The Complete Works of Shakespeare') but I suppose they didn't have enough time to do that. Holding the script in front of an audience seems more like watching a rehearsal to me, an unfinished work in progress, similiar to an actor recording their dialogue in a studio; I found the tall microphones distracting, too. For me, all of this destroys the illusion of seeing a character live their life in the play. I'm very surprised that it seems to be accepted in the theatre. I wouldn't have held a script; I've always believed that an audience deserves the best performance, no matter what, even if it's for charity. Or perhaps, their characters were holding scripts for their play? If theatres don't already do this, I thought that another way that they could raise money, rather than overwhelming people by asking for so much at one time, (judging by the seats that they still had left near the performance day, I'd say the price kept people away) is to have a donation box in the lobby, year-round, for all shows, in case, someone might want to give extra, spare change after a show. there are more kinds of theater out there. this kind would probably fall into the 'alienation effect' category. wiki: The alienation effect (from the German Verfremdungseffekt) is a theatrical and cinematic device "which prevents the audience from losing itself passively and completely in the character created by the actor, and which consequently leads the audience to be a consciously critical observer." The term was coined by playwright Bertolt Brecht to describe the aesthetics of epic theatre.so 'destroying the illusion' - as you said - was maybe their goal.
|
|
|
Post by snivellusfriend on Nov 1, 2008 12:16:10 GMT -4
there are more kinds of theater out there. this kind would probably fall into the 'alienation effect'. wiki: The alienation effect (from the German Verfremdungseffekt) is a theatrical and cinematic device "which prevents the audience from losing itself passively and completely in the character created by the actor, and which consequently leads the audience to be a consciously critical observer." The term was coined by playwright Bertolt Brecht to describe the aesthetics of epic theatre.I guess there are! ("more kinds of theater out there") Thanks for that. I guess I'm used to watching and enjoying seeing actors completely portray their character's life, and imagined that the theatre would want to stay away from modern technology, especially when performing Shakespeare because the actors in Shakespeare's day didn't have them and they'd strive to perform the same way, though not neccesarily without wearing modern clothes.
|
|