|
|
Post by linus108 on Apr 10, 2007 10:07:43 GMT -4
wow would be cool, but haven´t even seen the third one. is it good? yeah the third one is really good. i think it was better than the second one. but the first one is stil my favorite!  |
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Apr 10, 2007 10:13:08 GMT -4
i liked the second one, so gotta watch the third one soon  agreed, the first one will always be the best one, because of......Michael  |
|
|
|
Post by bobdoc on Apr 13, 2007 22:07:03 GMT -4
Tobin Bell gave a very brief interview for aintitcool.com[the interviewer was able to see him for 5 minutes before another scheduled interview]He said they haven't even given him a script yet, but that he'll be in Saw 4 somehow. It's at www.aintitcool.com/node/32283 |
|
|
|
Post by linus108 on Apr 17, 2007 13:33:15 GMT -4
of course he will be in it. he is what makes the movie, IMO. i am a huge fan of Tobin Bell
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlotte on Apr 17, 2007 13:37:05 GMT -4
of course he will be in it. he is what makes the movie, IMO. i am a huge fan of Tobin Bell that´s cool. Tobin Bell rocks! |
|
|
|
Post by sleepless on Apr 25, 2007 15:28:21 GMT -4
I've watched the third one recently. Not bad... Still like the first one best though. Though I'm really confused now about a 4th and a 5th. I thought John died at the end of the 3rd?  |
|
|
|
Post by dutchie on Nov 18, 2007 10:51:04 GMT -4
I found the third one was very boring, the chicken I was eating during the film was the highlight of the evening.
|
|
|
|
Post by DHARMA janitor on Nov 20, 2007 11:13:22 GMT -4
I think to make anymore saw movies without michael in them is just a slap in the face. I think 3 would have been enough. Dont tell me there going to make a 5th movie??
|
|
|
|
Post by dutchie on Nov 20, 2007 18:33:16 GMT -4
They are. And they are also gonna make a Saw 6.
This is getting out of control.
|
|
|
|
Post by DHARMA janitor on Nov 21, 2007 6:47:16 GMT -4
oh god! they are just going to ruin it so badly!
|
|
|
|
Post by Robyn [Emerson-aholic] on Nov 23, 2007 10:01:40 GMT -4
i hate it wen they make like a billion sequels  its like ENUF ALREADY!! i always think that wen they start to do that, its not about the story anymore, its just that they know how successful the others were and so they just want to squeeze some more money out of the general public. then for me it takes the whole point out of a movie  |
|
|
|
Post by DHARMA janitor on Nov 24, 2007 16:25:44 GMT -4
i hate it wen they make like a billion sequels its like ENUF ALREADY!! i always think that wen they start to do that, its not about the story anymore, its just that they know how successful the others were and so they just want to squeeze some more money out of the general public. then for me it takes the whole point out of a movie and the fact that they can't think of anything original so they release the same film over and over until people get so pissed of and dont go to see it anymore then the producer finaly get the message and pull the plug on it  sorry if this sounds like in ranting. |
|
|
|
Post by bensbunnylover on Nov 24, 2007 23:38:19 GMT -4
Has anyone actually saw "Saw 4" yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by DHARMA janitor on Nov 25, 2007 14:11:44 GMT -4
No and i dont wish too coz its the same as saw 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by bensbunnylover on Nov 25, 2007 14:17:37 GMT -4
No. it is absolutely nothing like SAW 1 (which is why some do not like it) Others happen to love it though.
I do not recommend seeing it, if you did not like Saw 3 because it has a lot to do with Saw 3. If you did like Saw 3, however, it would be good to see this. This movie picks right back up where it left off.
And these sequels go with the storyline. They don't randomly pick up somewhere like other horror flicks do. There's an actual story being told. Guess it just depends if you like that story...
|
|
![Robyn [Emerson-aholic] Avatar](http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/4/m_530b165192f74b8e9e0ac22cf48f61c6.gif)
its like ENUF ALREADY!! i always think that wen they start to do that, its not about the story anymore, its just that they know how successful the others were and so they just want to squeeze some more money out of the general public. then for me it takes the whole point out of a movie 
