|
Post by bobdoc on Dec 31, 2009 15:55:33 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2009 17:13:43 GMT -4
I think that's been the problem all along: Jack getting in the way. LOL! Especially between Bocke.
|
|
|
Post by mrsmichaelemerson on Jan 1, 2010 4:54:35 GMT -4
does anyone have the original of this photo, and not just the magazine scan?
|
|
|
Post by rage on Jan 1, 2010 13:46:53 GMT -4
I think BSG were first to use The Last Supper theme for the group photo to series finale.
So far, I like this one.
|
|
|
Post by caz (Caroline) on Jan 1, 2010 21:01:50 GMT -4
Love the pic, Michael looks nice of course ;D
|
|
|
Post by gem10 on Jan 3, 2010 8:26:24 GMT -4
I'm not really familiar with the arrangement of figures in the original painting. Who is Ben in place of ?
|
|
xanne
Novice Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by xanne on Jan 3, 2010 16:34:50 GMT -4
does anyone have the original of this photo, and not just the magazine scan? here you are ;D larger version: img8.imageshack.us/img8/8151/2r57xjm.jpgand this one, the original painting From left to right: Bartholomew, James, son of Alphaeus and Andrew form a group of three, all are surprised -looks like these ones are Ilana, Richard and Clarie-. Judas, Peter and John form another group of three. Judas is the only person to have his elbow on the table. -Sayid and Ben could be Judas; look of complicity- Jesus -it seems to be John- Apostle Thomas, James the Greater and Philip are the next group of three. Thomas is clearly upset; James the Greater looks stunned, with his arms in the air. Meanwhile, Philip appears to be requesting some explanation. Matthew, Jude Thaddeus and Simon the Zealot are the final group of three. Both Jude Thaddeus and Matthew are turned toward Simon, perhaps to find out if he has any answer to their initial questions.read more
|
|
|
Post by rage on Jan 3, 2010 17:46:21 GMT -4
Yep, Sayid is in Judas' place. Locke is Jesus and Ben looks like Philip.
|
|
|
Post by bobdoc on Jan 3, 2010 21:29:05 GMT -4
If Phillip is "requesting some explanation", then considering Ben's "What about me?!" speech to end S5, the comparison between them is apt.
|
|
|
Post by caz (Caroline) on Jan 3, 2010 22:11:38 GMT -4
Never thought of it like that, mmm you've got a point there.
|
|
|
Post by tigerlily on Jan 3, 2010 22:13:44 GMT -4
Who is Jack? Shouldn't he be Thomas?? Hrmm....methinks Sun lurves Lapidus more than she lurves Jin!! That would be an excellent plot twist!!
|
|
|
Post by caz (Caroline) on Jan 3, 2010 22:35:57 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by tigerlily on Jan 4, 2010 12:23:00 GMT -4
That's funny Tigerlily Sun and Lapidus, maybe they will get it on and when Sun gets reunited with Jin there's a huge punch up between them ha ha ha, My money's on Jin (thinking back to when he beat the hell out of Michael in S1). ;D I do hope theres gonna be more scenes between Ben & Juliette I miss the chemistry between them (He must still Love her) Oh and remember that she's his. Wish he said that to me Yup, Jin would win the fight but Lapidus would definitely squeeze in a few fun snarky lines before he bites the dust!! I would love so much to see Sawyer and Juliet together again as well. I hope they give us a little taste of it, even if it is only in a flashback. He truly loved her - his pain was so obvious when he lost her.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2010 14:25:02 GMT -4
Whose skulls are those underneath the table? Makes you wonder what they had for their last supper.
|
|
|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Jan 4, 2010 15:40:53 GMT -4
I've been thinking about this photoshoot a lot and came to realize that, once again, the producers are messing with us. This picture has no symbolic value about LOST whatsoever. One thing that we need to keep in mind is that Damon Lindelof is a new convert to Catholicism. So, essentially, he is in love with religious symbols. Let us not forget the episodes “The 23rd Psalm and “Fire and Water,” which, by the way, went absolutely nowhere. And that's where this picture is heading. It's a cute picture that is there for enjoyment but not for enlightment.
|
|