|
Post by henryrocks on Sept 8, 2007 9:06:53 GMT -4
Anyone watched Miss South Carolina's interview segment on YouTube? (For the Miss Teen USA show, I believe) Then directly afterward go watch an interview given by Michael. You will shake your head in wonder. Aw, Michael, you're so smart! *gives him a big hug* Do this. The contrast is amazing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2007 2:38:17 GMT -4
I saw that. Quite frankly, I am amazed they still do Q&A with beauty pagaent contestants. The point is that they're pretty/beautiful, not smart. My thought was "Why are you asking her to think? This is not something she has been trained to do." I would take those pageants more seriously if they also stressed smarts. But they don't. Just looks.
There is no question Michael has got a verbal mojo going on. Even compared with other actors he comes off much better than most. That really shows when the curtain goes up or director yells "Action."
|
|
|
Post by Henry Gale on Sept 9, 2007 4:40:55 GMT -4
Unfortunately, as loquacious or eloquent as I am when I write/type, I would come across sounding even worse than the dunderhead. That is, unless I've planned what I'm going to say ahead of time and rehearsed it for ages - which I'm not likely to be able to do 80% of the time out there in the real world...
I'd be ashamed to know what people think of me and my oratory skill (or lack thereof). Just yesterday, I stuttered and mumbled and blathered my way through an interview with the choirmaster of the local school's choir (I wanted the post of choir pianist), who had to have me repeat almost every sentence I said. It was as embarrassing as ever. And I can't say this is the first time something like this has happened to me. Thank goodness I got the job... even after I managed to bungle up the piano audition too. Personally, I think they were desperate for a pianist and I was the only one available, so she had to accept me. Now I'm slightly daunted by the prospect of having to meet up with the choir (and her) every other day, because what is she going to think of me, having given such a poor first impression of myself?
But I digress...
I have to agree, Michael's interviews are an infinite joy to watch - to begin with, he definitely comes across as educated. His responses are insightful, funny, and he phrases things so well. And it all seems natural, too, not like he's been rehearsing what to say. Which is more than you can say for some people when they do manage to sound remotely intelligent in public...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2007 19:34:33 GMT -4
I'm pretty sure you got the job, Henry Gale, despite your perceived stuttering and mumbling, because your interviewer could see that you were well-trained, talented, intelligent and capable of the doing the job. Congratulations and good luck. I'm sure as time goes by, it'll begin to feel like old hat.
I too mumble when talking and don't always express myself succinctly. I used to back in the day when I was doing oratory and debate. Training really makes a difference, but regardless of how well people can speak publicly, you can always tell whether they've got the goods.
|
|
|
Post by bobdoc on Sept 9, 2007 19:58:25 GMT -4
My dad always says that I sound much better when I type out something than when I actually speak, and I have to agree. I don't stutter or anything, but I ramble a lot more and I can make a lot better points in a convo when I type them out and have time to think out what I'm gonna say- when talking with my mouth, it's somewhere above the beauty pagent people, but well below Michael.
|
|
|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Sept 9, 2007 20:06:40 GMT -4
I think speaking eloquently comes with age, wisdom, and experience. I now speak almost as eloquently as I write, but I am an older person. And, yes, there are times when the cat gets my tongue.
I feel sorry for that poor girl. I saw her in another interview and she didn't sound as dumb as in this YouTube presentation. Unfortunately, were it not for YouTube, this faux pas would have been a thing of the past by now. She seems to have a good sense of humor and is going with the flow.
As far as Michael is concerned, the man has a MFA from a very prestigious acting school. He is a Shakespearean actor, which means he reads those horribly difficult plays, studies them, interprets them, and most of all undestands them. No wonder that he has such a great expansive vocabulary and is extremely eloquent.
|
|
|
Post by benobsessed on Sept 10, 2007 13:29:31 GMT -4
I look forward to listening to Michael's interviews because of his intellect and humour.
I myself am dreadful at public speaking and somehow managed to scrape through my GCSE English- both my written language and literature, is also rather basic. Hence my career in science, I can say things blunt and to the point, a few sentences expressing all I need to say, sometimes just a few words such as positve/ negative suffice.
I feel sorry for the poor girl, I 'm sure I would sound just as bad- the idea of standing infront of people scares me to death, so much so that my emploers even force me to do presentations infront of the pathologists on topics that they are experts in, in an attempt to build up my confidence- six years on and it's still not working!
However, it does concern me that society is shallow when it comes to looks over intellect
|
|
|
Post by melissaq9 on Sept 10, 2007 22:24:15 GMT -4
I seem to have the opposite problem. When I was younger I was a wonderful speaker. I would always volunteer to read out loud and didn't stumble over my words or say things that didn't make sense.
But as I get older it seems I am reverting. Now I sometimes stutter over my words or can't think of the right word to say. I also start talking really fast when I am in front of people giving a presentation. Thankfully, this happens mostly with people my own age or older. For now I'm still okay with the younger kinds, which is good, because I have to teach them.
I much prefer writing because I feel so much more at ease when I can choose my words and go back and change things if I don't like the way it sounds. Maybe that is why I want to be a novelist?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2007 2:10:29 GMT -4
OK, I'm sorry but I had to mention this. This cracked me up. Now I understand it all. This is from the "I can has cheezburger" site, which spoofs cats and their poor language skills:
|
|
|
Post by henryrocks on Sept 21, 2007 11:10:11 GMT -4
*huffs* SOME cats maybe - definitely some. Some I'd be surprised if they could form a complete sentence.
But wouldn't dogs be a better candidate for non-intelligible-ness? ;D Cats are smart, yo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2007 1:11:05 GMT -4
*huffs* SOME cats maybe - definitely some. Some I'd be surprised if they could form a complete sentence. But wouldn't dogs be a better candidate for non-intelligible-ness? ;D Cats are smart, yo. Cats are smart, smarter than people, but they have no time for our silly human rules, and that includes the ones for grammer, spelling, diction, etc.
|
|