|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Jun 19, 2010 20:13:25 GMT -4
You can find more and larger versions here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2010 0:05:08 GMT -4
Oh, that pic of them on the bed with head on her shoulder is just adorable.
Great find. Thanks for posting, Edith. Missed you at the Rewind.
|
|
|
Post by nobennolost on Jun 20, 2010 8:41:30 GMT -4
Nice pic I'd like to see a baby of this couple I think this boy would be pretty beautiful. I don't know what they are waiting for...hehehe
|
|
|
Post by caz (Caroline) on Jun 20, 2010 13:21:26 GMT -4
Ahhhh that's a gorgeous pic of them in bed I agree Nobennolost I'd love to see them with a baby too. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2010 14:56:43 GMT -4
In a sense they have a "baby" with their new dog. (Believe me, in some ways having a pet is like having a permanent 6-year-old in the house.) But I've heard they don't want children. And just my bias here, but they are getting a big old for children. Not that it couldn't or shouldn't be, but having children in your older years, while in some respects is good, can be very difficult.
|
|
|
Post by pflippflop09 on Jun 20, 2010 15:17:16 GMT -4
I agree with both things. I would LOVE to see them have a child! That way they could pass on their superior acting skills! However, they are getting a little too old to have a child...
|
|
|
Post by nobennolost on Jun 20, 2010 15:19:29 GMT -4
In a sense they have a "baby" with their new dog. (Believe me, in some ways having a pet is like having a permanent 6-year-old in the house.) But I've heard they don't want children. And just my bias here, but they are getting a big old for children. Not that it couldn't or shouldn't be, but having children in your older years, while in some respects is good, can be very difficult. I knew that they have a new pet it doesn't mean anything I think they would be even happier than now with a baby... but as you said it could be a bit difficult maybe for their age. It's weird if they don't want a baby but if they are happy I'm glad for them. By the way I've seen that Carrie is 43 and I thought they look like the same age, right??
|
|
|
Post by caz (Caroline) on Jun 20, 2010 15:24:06 GMT -4
If they had a baby now that would be OK in terms of age wouldn't it I mean they're not pensioners yet ....my mum had me at 41.
|
|
|
Post by nobennolost on Jun 20, 2010 18:40:22 GMT -4
If they had a baby now that would be OK in terms of age wouldn't it I mean they're not pensioners yet ....my mum had me at 41. Upss.. My mum had me at 43 " coincidence "?? hehe So They would be ok with a baby but that is not the best age to get a baby I'm not going to deny it )
|
|
|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Jun 20, 2010 23:22:50 GMT -4
It's really none of our business about whether they have children or not. I did read on Carrie's myspace account (she no longer updates) that she didn't want to have any children.
|
|
|
Post by lostali75 on Jun 21, 2010 10:00:17 GMT -4
In a sense they have a "baby" with their new dog. (Believe me, in some ways having a pet is like having a permanent 6-year-old in the house.) But I've heard they don't want children. And just my bias here, but they are getting a big old for children. Not that it couldn't or shouldn't be, but having children in your older years, while in some respects is good, can be very difficult. I knew that they have a new pet it doesn't mean anything I think they would be even happier than now with a baby... but as you said it could be a bit difficult maybe for their age. It's weird if they don't want a baby but if they are happy I'm glad for them. By the way I've seen that Carrie is 43 and I thought they look like the same age, right?? I found out a long time ago that this particular conversation can have adverse reactions. I say this with experience. Some people truly do not want children, some people can't have children. I know I'm late to saying this but I wanted to let it be known. Unless we are in their shoes, I would not speculate to their personal decisions.
|
|
|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Jun 21, 2010 10:39:34 GMT -4
I knew that they have a new pet it doesn't mean anything I think they would be even happier than now with a baby... but as you said it could be a bit difficult maybe for their age. It's weird if they don't want a baby but if they are happy I'm glad for them. By the way I've seen that Carrie is 43 and I thought they look like the same age, right?? ... they would be even happier than now with a baby... This is the biggest misnomer, ever. Having a baby doesn't necessarily make you happier. In fact, it can make you more miserable and, at times, can lead to divorce. Having a child is extremely stressful, and you should only have them if you want them. A child is extremely dependent on you for the first 18 years. They depend on your wisdom to provide them guidance; on your financial stability, to provide them sustanance; and on your time, to provide them the foundation to be a well-formed person. And, to add insult to injury, the first year, the child is totally dependent on you and demands your attention 20 hours out of the 24-hour day. That, my friends, can make you or break you. For career-oriented people, the time required to be with a child is enough to turn them off from having them. A dog is content at staying home by itself while the "owner" is working. A child needs attention. Granted that the Emerson-Preston duo have the means to get a nanny, sitter, au pair, or whatever to be there with their child when they're not; but then, I ask you, why have a child to have others raise them? Do you know what it's like after you bring home a child from the maternity ward? It's hell. Just think about the toll pregnancy makes on your body. Then think about the long, arduous labor. It’s painful, uncomfortable, and tiring. A few hours after giving birth, you bring home this screaming machine. You are tired, but the screaming machine doesn’t care. He or she is hungry, uncomfortable, whatever; s/he will let you know that you are needed to soothe his or her discomfort. And if you want to sleep, you can’t. The machine can pierce your eardrums with her or his screaming. So, even when you absolutely wanted that child, you will hate the child for not allowing you the simple comfort of sleep. Yes, my friends, those of you who have had no children, have no idea what you are talking about when you say that people will be happier with a child. A child will only bring you happiness if you want that child, because for the first year, your patience will be tested over and over again. Now, I am not saying that you should not have children. I, personally, love children. But we must be very aware of what we get ourselves into. I am glad that I had the children I did. I waited 7 years for my first one to arrive. I loved every minute of motherhood. But then, I didn't have the strong desire to have a career. My career was motherhood. But that screaming machine was not always a pleasant experience.
|
|
|
Post by nobennolost on Jun 21, 2010 12:41:45 GMT -4
I knew that they have a new pet it doesn't mean anything I think they would be even happier than now with a baby... but as you said it could be a bit difficult maybe for their age. It's weird if they don't want a baby but if they are happy I'm glad for them. By the way I've seen that Carrie is 43 and I thought they look like the same age, right?? ... they would be even happier than now with a baby... This is the biggest misnomer, ever. Having a baby doesn't necessarily make you happier. In fact, it can make you more miserable and, at times, can lead to divorce. Having a child is extremely stressful, and you should only have them if you want them. A child is extremely dependent on you for the first 18 years. They depend on your wisdom to provide them guidance; on your financial stability, to provide them sustanance; and on your time, to provide them the foundation to be a well-formed person. And, to add insult to injury, the first year, the child is totally dependent on you and demands your attention 20 hours out of the 24-hour day. That, my friends, can make you or break you. For career-oriented people, the time required to be with a child is enough to turn them off from having them. A dog is content at staying home by itself while the "owner" is working. A child needs attention. Granted that the Emerson-Preston duo have the means to get a nanny, sitter, au pair, or whatever to be there with their child when they're not; but then, I ask you, why have a child to have others raise them? Do you know what it's like after you bring home a child from the maternity ward? It's hell. Just think about the toll pregnancy makes on your body. Then think about the long, arduous labor. It’s painful, uncomfortable, and tiring. A few hours after giving birth, you bring home this screaming machine. You are tired, but the screaming machine doesn’t care. He or she is hungry, uncomfortable, whatever; s/he will let you know that you are needed to soothe his or her discomfort. And if you want to sleep, you can’t. The machine can pierce your eardrums with her or his screaming. So, even when you absolutely wanted that child, you will hate the child for not allowing you the simple comfort of sleep. Yes, my friends, those of you who have had no children, have no idea what you are talking about when you say that people will be happier with a child. A child will only bring you happiness if you want that child, because for the first year, your patience will be tested over and over again. Now, I am not saying that you should not have children. I, personally, love children. But we must be very aware of what we get ourselves into. I am glad that I had the children I did. I waited 7 years for my first one to arrive. I loved every minute of motherhood. But then, I didn't have the strong desire to have a career. My career was motherhood. But that screaming machine was not always a pleasant experience. yeah, nice speech... maybe I expressed myself a bit wrong when I said that they would be even happier with a baby, as you said they would be happier if they wish have a baby, I totally agree with you, I personally have no any experience about that maybe it is because I am still young. So I wish it hasn't bothered you I always write with my best sense of the word but maybe in english it is more difficult for me... I hope they are happy with or without a baby like each one of us
|
|
|
Post by Edith S. Baker on Jun 21, 2010 12:48:45 GMT -4
nobennolost, I took no offense to your post about happiness coming to you when you have children. I just want to make young people aware that children are not the answer for everyone. There are so many people who have children because their marriage is falling apart. They think that once the child arrives, they will be enveloped in happiness and the marriage will be stronger by the addition to the family. It’s just not so. The opposite is true, children put a strain on marriages.
|
|
|
Post by nobennolost on Jun 21, 2010 13:01:49 GMT -4
nobennolost, I took no offense to your post about happiness coming to you when you have children. I just want to make young people aware that children are not the answer for everyone. There are so many people who have children because their marriage is falling apart. They think that once the child arrives, they will be enveloped in happiness and the marriage will be stronger by the addition to the family. It’s just not so. The opposite is true, children put a strain on marriages. Glad to hear that I thought my comment was inappropiated. Thanks for your answer I take it like an advise.
|
|